Ich stimme der Verwendung von Cookies zu. Auch wenn ich diese Website weiter nutze, gilt dies als Zustimmung.

Bitte lesen und akzeptieren Sie die Datenschutzinformation und Cookie-Informationen, damit Sie unser Angebot weiter nutzen können. Natürlich können Sie diese Einwilligung jederzeit widerrufen.





Does the US economy need a mid-cycle adjustment? (Martin Ertl)

4 weitere Bilder
(mit historischen Bildtexten)

US Labor Market (non-farm payrolls)

Inflation & Inflation Expectations

Federal Funds Rate Market Expectations

Interest Rates

Autor:
Martin Ertl

Chief Economist, UNIQA Capital Markets GmbH

>> Website


>> zur Startseite mit allen Blogs

06.08.2019, 7363 Zeichen
  • The US business cycle remains healthy, despite being the longest in history.
  • Personal consumption drives the expansion, supported by a strong labor market. 
  • Fed lowered interest rate to 2.25 %, in light of trade related uncertainty and downside risks to the outlook.
  • There is no clear-cut monetary policy case for the Fed’s mid-cycle adjustment, which remains ambiguous also within the FOMC.

  The US economy continues its longest expansion since the end of WW II, exceeding the Great Moderation (03/1991-02/2001) by two months. The Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) has recently released its preliminary estimate of gross domestic product (GDP) for the second quarter of 2019 (Q2 19) at 2.1 % (seasonally adjusted at annual rates). With GDP growth at 3.1 % in Q1 2019, the US economy has expanded more rapidly during the first half of the year (2.6 %) than it did in 2018 (2.5 %, quarterly average). Thus, even though, growth has moderated somewhat in Q2 19, overall, the US economy is expanding at a solid rate.

  Private consumption has been the main driver of GDP growth during the second quarter, contributing 2.85 %-age points (Figure 1). Also, government consumption, mainly federal nondefense expenditures, added to GDP growth (0.85 %-age points). Other factors subtracted from growth. Private investment declined and so did net exports. The decline in fixed investment, however, is less severe than it might seem, as changes in inventories led the decline (-0.86 %-age points). Net exports subtracted 0.65 %-age points from GDP growth with exports declining while imports stagnating.

The economy is supported by a strong labor market at full-employment and solid wage growth. In July, only 3.7 % of the US labor force was without a job and employment is further expanding. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that 164 thousand nonfarm jobs were created in July which is below, but close to, the benchmark of 200 thousand (Figure 2). Notable employment gains were reported in some service industries (professional and technical services, health care, social assistance and financial services) while employment in the manufacturing sector has not changed materially. In 2018 employment gains had averaged 223 thousand per month. In contrast, wage growth has not slowed down. Average hourly earnings increased by 3.2 % in July (y/y) which is in line with the average over the past 6 months. As long as the picture of low unemployment, steady job creation and solid wage gains prolongs, it is fair to assume that private consumption will further support the US expansion.

Based on already available business cycle indicators for the third quarter of 2019, the US economy is expected to grow between 1.6 (NY Fed) and 1.9 % (Atlanta Fed) in Q3. Similar to the previous quarter, consumer spending is expected to be the main growth driver. If a similar pace can be maintained in Q4, the US economy would grow by 2.3 % in 2019. The Federal Reserve Board members and Federal Reserve Bank presidents have projected GDP growth at 2.1 % for the year 2019, based on their assessment in June (median of Fed Economic Projections). Thus, it might well be that US growth tops previous estimates.

Given the state of the US economy it might, thus, come as a surprise that the Federal Reserve Bank (Fed) has decided to ease monetary conditions. Last week, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) decreased the federal funds rate by 25 basis points (bp) to range between 2.0 and 2.25 %. It has been the first interest rate cut since December 2008 when the Fed lowered the federal funds rate to range between 0 and 0.25 %. Moreover, it marks the end of an interest rate hiking cycle which started in December 2015 and ended three years later in December last year.

  So, why did the Fed decide to loosen monetary policy, in spite of, the favorable economic outlook? One reason is inflation. The Fed’s preferred inflation gauge, the deflator of personal consumption expenditures, runs well below the Fed’s 2 % inflation target, currently at 1.4 % (June). The same holds for consumer price (CPI) inflation which is only marginally higher at 1.6 % (June). More importantly, though, is the inflation outlook, which is, predominantly, driven by expectations about future price developments as well as the expected state of the economy. Measures of inflation expectations can be derived from financial markets (market-based) as well as surveys (survey-based). Market-based inflation expectations tend to be more volatile than survey-based measures, as they carry a time-varying risk premium component. In the United States, survey-based inflation expectations remain well-anchored at the Fed’s inflation target (Figure 3). Market-based inflation expectations are currently below the inflation target, though, can move back to 2 % very quickly as happened in July. The FOMC members expect inflation to converge to the 2 % target by 2021, also being facilitated by a lower federal funds rate.

Besides promoting a faster return to the inflation target, President Powell justified the decrease in the federal funds rate as an insurance “against downside risks from weak global growth and trade policy uncertainties”. It was further emphasized that the rate cut should not be interpreted as the start of an extensive cutting cycle but rather as a mid-cycle adjustment to prolong the economic expansion. Previous mid-cycle adjustments consisted of three rate cuts. The federal funds rate was lowered from 6 % to 5.25 % in 1995/96 and again from 5.5 to 4.75 % in 1998. Financial market expectations of the future path of the federal funds rate imply two more rate cuts in 2019 and one-to-two cuts in 2020 (Figure 4). Thus, markets currently expect a more aggressive monetary easing than past mid-cycle adjustments would imply. As previously the FOMC statement emphasized that the future path of the federal funds rate will be data-dependent. At the press conference, Powell emphasized the importance of trade tensions and the limited experience central bankers’ have regarding their broader macroeconomic implications. “It’s learning-by-doing”, so Powell.

The US economy is healthy and well-balanced. Yet, global factors, predominantly trade policy disruptions, put downside risks to the outlook. Uncertainty undermines business confidence, whose effects on output the Fed finds difficult to assess. The ISM manufacturing Purchasing Manager Index (PMI), a leading business sentiment indicator, has dropped to its lowest level since August 2016 (51.2 in July). In light of deteriorating global trade, demand is weak in the manufacturing sector and so is business investment. The Fed’s insurance cut was, therefore, predominantly driven by uncertainties regarding the global outlook rather than the current state of the US economy. 

Whether the Fed’s mid-cycle adjustment to a somewhat more accommodative stance of monetary policy was necessary, remains ambiguous. It is definitely not a clear-cut case for monetary policy intervention. Two members of the FOMC (Esther George and Eric Rosengren) would have preferred to keep the federal funds rate constant. The Fed has delivered, at least partly, to the frontrunning of financial markets and President Trump’s wish for lower interest rates.

Authors

Martin Ertl Franz Xaver Zobl

Chief Economist Economist

UNIQA Capital Markets GmbH UNIQA Capital Markets GmbH


(06.08.2019)

BSN Podcasts
Christian Drastil: Wiener Börse Plausch

BörseGeschichte Podcast: Heiko Thieme vor 10 Jahren zum ATX-25er




 

Bildnachweis

1. GDP growth by main expenditure components

2. US Labor Market (non-farm payrolls)

3. Inflation & Inflation Expectations

4. Federal Funds Rate Market Expectations

5. Interest Rates

Aktien auf dem Radar:Amag, Polytec Group, DO&CO, Semperit, Rosenbauer, UBM, Rosgix, AT&S, Bawag, Verbund, Uniqa, RBI, voestalpine, Austriacard Holdings AG, Rath AG, SBO, Addiko Bank, Frequentis, BKS Bank Stamm, Oberbank AG Stamm, RHI Magnesita, Mayr-Melnhof, Telekom Austria, Österreichische Post, Siemens Energy, Fresenius Medical Care, E.ON , RWE, SAP, Scout24, BASF.


Random Partner

Wiener Privatbank
Die Wiener Privatbank ist eine unabhängige, unternehmerisch handelnde Privatbank mit Sitz in Wien.
 Als börsennotiertes Unternehmen steht die Bank für Transparenz und verfügt über eine äußerst solide finanzielle Basis. Zu den Kundinnen und Kunden zählen Family Offices, PrivatinvestorInnen, Institutionen sowie Stiftungen im In- und Ausland.

>> Besuchen Sie 61 weitere Partner auf boerse-social.com/partner


US Labor Market (non-farm payrolls)


Inflation & Inflation Expectations


Federal Funds Rate Market Expectations


Interest Rates


 Latest Blogs

» Börse-Inputs auf Spotify zu u.a. Heiko Thieme, Cyan, Klöckner & Co.

» Wiener Börse Party #1074: ATX etwas schwächer, Cyan wird am Börsentag Wi...

» Österreich-Depots: High zum Wochenende (Depot Kommentar)

» Börsegeschichte 16.1.: Extremes zu Agrana und Austriacard (Börse Geschic...

» Nachlese: Markus Cserna cyan, Barbara Riedl-Wiesinger Bell (audio cd.at)

» In den News: Flughafen Wien, Reploid, Novomatic (Christine Petzwinkler)

» Wiener Börse zu Mittag etwas fester: AustriaCard, Amag, Bawag gesucht

» Börsepeople im Podcast S23/02: Markus Cserna

» ATX-Trends: Polytec, VIG, Uniqa, Bawag, Erste Group, RBI ...

» Wiener Börse Party #1073: ATX wieder auf High, Versicherer top, auch die...


Useletter

Die Useletter "Morning Xpresso" und "Evening Xtrakt" heben sich deutlich von den gängigen Newslettern ab. Beispiele ansehen bzw. kostenfrei anmelden. Wichtige Börse-Infos garantiert.

Newsletter abonnieren

Runplugged

Infos über neue Financial Literacy Audio Files für die Runplugged App
(kostenfrei downloaden über http://runplugged.com/spreadit)

per Newsletter erhalten


Meistgelesen
>> mehr





PIR-Zeichnungsprodukte
Newsflow
>> mehr

Börse Social Club Board
>> mehr
    BSN Vola-Event Bayer
    BSN Vola-Event Siemens Energy
    BSN Vola-Event Bayer
    #gabb #2020

    Featured Partner Video

    BörseGeschichte Podcast: Barbara Potisk-Eibensteiner vor 10 Jahren zum ATX-25er

    Der ATX wurde dieser Tage 35. Rund um "25 Jahre ATX" haben wir im Dezember 2015 und Jänner 2016 eine grossangelegte Audioproduktion mit dem Ziel einer Fest-CD gemacht, die auch auf Audible als Hörb...

    Books josefchladek.com

    Jan Holkup
    Posedy / Hunting Stands
    2025
    PositiF

    Krass Clement
    Født af mørket
    2025
    Gyldendal

    Claudia Andujar
    Genocídio do Yanomami
    2025
    Void

    Michael Rathmayr
    Remedy
    2025
    Nearest Truth

    Pia Paulina Guilmoth & Jesse Bull Saffire
    Fishworm
    2025
    Void


    06.08.2019, 7363 Zeichen
    • The US business cycle remains healthy, despite being the longest in history.
    • Personal consumption drives the expansion, supported by a strong labor market. 
    • Fed lowered interest rate to 2.25 %, in light of trade related uncertainty and downside risks to the outlook.
    • There is no clear-cut monetary policy case for the Fed’s mid-cycle adjustment, which remains ambiguous also within the FOMC.

      The US economy continues its longest expansion since the end of WW II, exceeding the Great Moderation (03/1991-02/2001) by two months. The Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) has recently released its preliminary estimate of gross domestic product (GDP) for the second quarter of 2019 (Q2 19) at 2.1 % (seasonally adjusted at annual rates). With GDP growth at 3.1 % in Q1 2019, the US economy has expanded more rapidly during the first half of the year (2.6 %) than it did in 2018 (2.5 %, quarterly average). Thus, even though, growth has moderated somewhat in Q2 19, overall, the US economy is expanding at a solid rate.

      Private consumption has been the main driver of GDP growth during the second quarter, contributing 2.85 %-age points (Figure 1). Also, government consumption, mainly federal nondefense expenditures, added to GDP growth (0.85 %-age points). Other factors subtracted from growth. Private investment declined and so did net exports. The decline in fixed investment, however, is less severe than it might seem, as changes in inventories led the decline (-0.86 %-age points). Net exports subtracted 0.65 %-age points from GDP growth with exports declining while imports stagnating.

    The economy is supported by a strong labor market at full-employment and solid wage growth. In July, only 3.7 % of the US labor force was without a job and employment is further expanding. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that 164 thousand nonfarm jobs were created in July which is below, but close to, the benchmark of 200 thousand (Figure 2). Notable employment gains were reported in some service industries (professional and technical services, health care, social assistance and financial services) while employment in the manufacturing sector has not changed materially. In 2018 employment gains had averaged 223 thousand per month. In contrast, wage growth has not slowed down. Average hourly earnings increased by 3.2 % in July (y/y) which is in line with the average over the past 6 months. As long as the picture of low unemployment, steady job creation and solid wage gains prolongs, it is fair to assume that private consumption will further support the US expansion.

    Based on already available business cycle indicators for the third quarter of 2019, the US economy is expected to grow between 1.6 (NY Fed) and 1.9 % (Atlanta Fed) in Q3. Similar to the previous quarter, consumer spending is expected to be the main growth driver. If a similar pace can be maintained in Q4, the US economy would grow by 2.3 % in 2019. The Federal Reserve Board members and Federal Reserve Bank presidents have projected GDP growth at 2.1 % for the year 2019, based on their assessment in June (median of Fed Economic Projections). Thus, it might well be that US growth tops previous estimates.

    Given the state of the US economy it might, thus, come as a surprise that the Federal Reserve Bank (Fed) has decided to ease monetary conditions. Last week, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) decreased the federal funds rate by 25 basis points (bp) to range between 2.0 and 2.25 %. It has been the first interest rate cut since December 2008 when the Fed lowered the federal funds rate to range between 0 and 0.25 %. Moreover, it marks the end of an interest rate hiking cycle which started in December 2015 and ended three years later in December last year.

      So, why did the Fed decide to loosen monetary policy, in spite of, the favorable economic outlook? One reason is inflation. The Fed’s preferred inflation gauge, the deflator of personal consumption expenditures, runs well below the Fed’s 2 % inflation target, currently at 1.4 % (June). The same holds for consumer price (CPI) inflation which is only marginally higher at 1.6 % (June). More importantly, though, is the inflation outlook, which is, predominantly, driven by expectations about future price developments as well as the expected state of the economy. Measures of inflation expectations can be derived from financial markets (market-based) as well as surveys (survey-based). Market-based inflation expectations tend to be more volatile than survey-based measures, as they carry a time-varying risk premium component. In the United States, survey-based inflation expectations remain well-anchored at the Fed’s inflation target (Figure 3). Market-based inflation expectations are currently below the inflation target, though, can move back to 2 % very quickly as happened in July. The FOMC members expect inflation to converge to the 2 % target by 2021, also being facilitated by a lower federal funds rate.

    Besides promoting a faster return to the inflation target, President Powell justified the decrease in the federal funds rate as an insurance “against downside risks from weak global growth and trade policy uncertainties”. It was further emphasized that the rate cut should not be interpreted as the start of an extensive cutting cycle but rather as a mid-cycle adjustment to prolong the economic expansion. Previous mid-cycle adjustments consisted of three rate cuts. The federal funds rate was lowered from 6 % to 5.25 % in 1995/96 and again from 5.5 to 4.75 % in 1998. Financial market expectations of the future path of the federal funds rate imply two more rate cuts in 2019 and one-to-two cuts in 2020 (Figure 4). Thus, markets currently expect a more aggressive monetary easing than past mid-cycle adjustments would imply. As previously the FOMC statement emphasized that the future path of the federal funds rate will be data-dependent. At the press conference, Powell emphasized the importance of trade tensions and the limited experience central bankers’ have regarding their broader macroeconomic implications. “It’s learning-by-doing”, so Powell.

    The US economy is healthy and well-balanced. Yet, global factors, predominantly trade policy disruptions, put downside risks to the outlook. Uncertainty undermines business confidence, whose effects on output the Fed finds difficult to assess. The ISM manufacturing Purchasing Manager Index (PMI), a leading business sentiment indicator, has dropped to its lowest level since August 2016 (51.2 in July). In light of deteriorating global trade, demand is weak in the manufacturing sector and so is business investment. The Fed’s insurance cut was, therefore, predominantly driven by uncertainties regarding the global outlook rather than the current state of the US economy. 

    Whether the Fed’s mid-cycle adjustment to a somewhat more accommodative stance of monetary policy was necessary, remains ambiguous. It is definitely not a clear-cut case for monetary policy intervention. Two members of the FOMC (Esther George and Eric Rosengren) would have preferred to keep the federal funds rate constant. The Fed has delivered, at least partly, to the frontrunning of financial markets and President Trump’s wish for lower interest rates.

    Authors

    Martin Ertl Franz Xaver Zobl

    Chief Economist Economist

    UNIQA Capital Markets GmbH UNIQA Capital Markets GmbH


    (06.08.2019)

    BSN Podcasts
    Christian Drastil: Wiener Börse Plausch

    BörseGeschichte Podcast: Heiko Thieme vor 10 Jahren zum ATX-25er




     

    Bildnachweis

    1. GDP growth by main expenditure components

    2. US Labor Market (non-farm payrolls)

    3. Inflation & Inflation Expectations

    4. Federal Funds Rate Market Expectations

    5. Interest Rates

    Aktien auf dem Radar:Amag, Polytec Group, DO&CO, Semperit, Rosenbauer, UBM, Rosgix, AT&S, Bawag, Verbund, Uniqa, RBI, voestalpine, Austriacard Holdings AG, Rath AG, SBO, Addiko Bank, Frequentis, BKS Bank Stamm, Oberbank AG Stamm, RHI Magnesita, Mayr-Melnhof, Telekom Austria, Österreichische Post, Siemens Energy, Fresenius Medical Care, E.ON , RWE, SAP, Scout24, BASF.


    Random Partner

    Wiener Privatbank
    Die Wiener Privatbank ist eine unabhängige, unternehmerisch handelnde Privatbank mit Sitz in Wien.
 Als börsennotiertes Unternehmen steht die Bank für Transparenz und verfügt über eine äußerst solide finanzielle Basis. Zu den Kundinnen und Kunden zählen Family Offices, PrivatinvestorInnen, Institutionen sowie Stiftungen im In- und Ausland.

    >> Besuchen Sie 61 weitere Partner auf boerse-social.com/partner


    US Labor Market (non-farm payrolls)


    Inflation & Inflation Expectations


    Federal Funds Rate Market Expectations


    Interest Rates


     Latest Blogs

    » Börse-Inputs auf Spotify zu u.a. Heiko Thieme, Cyan, Klöckner & Co.

    » Wiener Börse Party #1074: ATX etwas schwächer, Cyan wird am Börsentag Wi...

    » Österreich-Depots: High zum Wochenende (Depot Kommentar)

    » Börsegeschichte 16.1.: Extremes zu Agrana und Austriacard (Börse Geschic...

    » Nachlese: Markus Cserna cyan, Barbara Riedl-Wiesinger Bell (audio cd.at)

    » In den News: Flughafen Wien, Reploid, Novomatic (Christine Petzwinkler)

    » Wiener Börse zu Mittag etwas fester: AustriaCard, Amag, Bawag gesucht

    » Börsepeople im Podcast S23/02: Markus Cserna

    » ATX-Trends: Polytec, VIG, Uniqa, Bawag, Erste Group, RBI ...

    » Wiener Börse Party #1073: ATX wieder auf High, Versicherer top, auch die...


    Useletter

    Die Useletter "Morning Xpresso" und "Evening Xtrakt" heben sich deutlich von den gängigen Newslettern ab. Beispiele ansehen bzw. kostenfrei anmelden. Wichtige Börse-Infos garantiert.

    Newsletter abonnieren

    Runplugged

    Infos über neue Financial Literacy Audio Files für die Runplugged App
    (kostenfrei downloaden über http://runplugged.com/spreadit)

    per Newsletter erhalten


    Meistgelesen
    >> mehr





    PIR-Zeichnungsprodukte
    Newsflow
    >> mehr

    Börse Social Club Board
    >> mehr
      BSN Vola-Event Bayer
      BSN Vola-Event Siemens Energy
      BSN Vola-Event Bayer
      #gabb #2020

      Featured Partner Video

      BörseGeschichte Podcast: Barbara Potisk-Eibensteiner vor 10 Jahren zum ATX-25er

      Der ATX wurde dieser Tage 35. Rund um "25 Jahre ATX" haben wir im Dezember 2015 und Jänner 2016 eine grossangelegte Audioproduktion mit dem Ziel einer Fest-CD gemacht, die auch auf Audible als Hörb...

      Books josefchladek.com

      Pia Paulina Guilmoth & Jesse Bull Saffire
      Fishworm
      2025
      Void

      Joselito Verschaeve
      As Long as the Sun Lasts
      2025
      Void

      Tenmei Kanoh
      New York 1969
      2014
      Ishi Inc.

      Elizabeth Alderliesten
      Not Shameless
      2025
      Self published

      Michael Rathmayr
      Remedy
      2025
      Nearest Truth